Marijuana Prohibition Is Unscientific Unconstitutional And Unjust

Prohibition laws are supposed to protect people from bad decisions and prevent them from getting addicted to drugs. Unfortunately, these policies aren’t working. Each year, police arrest hundreds of thousands of people for possession of marijuana. Of these, only a small number spend any time in prison. In fact, 40,000 people have been sentenced to life in prison for growing or selling marijuana.

Throughout history, marijuana was considered a rare, little-used drug in the United States. However, as Mexican immigrants moved to the United States, they brought with them the tradition of smoking marihuana. As the fear of new immigrants grew, many hysterical claims about the dangers of marijuana became widespread. As a result, the term cannabis was largely replaced with the more anglicized “marijuana.” Soon, numerous states enacted laws outlawing the use of marijuana.

The prohibition of marijuana is a moral outrage. This policy was not well considered. Instead, it was driven by ignorance and xenophobia. We now know that marijuana does not cause death in many cases, so it is completely unfounded. The prohibition of marijuana does not harm us or the environment. As a matter of fact, it has many benefits for our society, and the prohibition of it is an inhumane practice.

Lastly, the prohibition of marijuana is inherently unjust. In addition to being inhumane, it violates basic moral principles. It treats pot merchants and liquor dealers as criminals, while leaving drinkers unmolested. The state of Washington is right to protect its citizens and the right to consume and sell cannabis. So, the marijuana prohibition should be withdrawn from the market.

The marijuana prohibition is based on lies, and it violates our rights and our Constitution. First of all, it is incompatible with the values of society. Its prohibition is unjust because it is inconsistent with the basic moral principles of the United States. Second, it violates our rights. For example, it discriminates against individuals based on race and gender.

Legalization is not the only way to protect the rights of individuals and the environment. The federal government has long fought against marijuana and has a history of enforcing the laws. Although cannabis has been illegal since the 1930s, the state has not complied with the law. Moreover, it has been a controversial topic since the 1970s.

Despite the growing evidence in favor of marijuana’s legalization, the United States has not made any substantial progress in reducing the number of drug-related deaths. While a few cases have been successful, the federal government still has not fully endorsed the law. Furthermore, it has made it harder for the marijuana industry to make a living. Aside from being illegal, the prohibition on marijuana has caused a significant economic impact.

Using the same logic, the CDC estimates that marijuana causes 88,000 deaths every year in the United States. No such figures have been published for marijuana. But Jeff Michael believes that marijuana isn’t dangerous. The CDC also says that it is impossible to determine if it does. A study by the University of Florida concluded that the drug does not cause death, so it isn’t a threat to public safety.

Despite the recent controversy over marijuana’s legal status in the US, the law has been in place for decades. The current administration has also made it illegal in Canada, which has further exacerbated https://www.ministryofcannabis.com/autoflowering-seeds/auto-gods-glue-feminized the problem. While the drug is still illegal in Canada, it is still illegal in the United States. This is simply unjust and illegitimate. As a result, it is not a safe drug to consume.

In the US, the government has failed to make marijuana legal in the US. The country’s criminals are not only criminals but also violent. The government has a long history of imposing restrictions on marijuana. It has no clear legal definition. The drug is illegal in several states. This is a major problem for our economy and for the country as a whole.